Scott, I wrote an entire article about it. https://skepticalscience.com/a-perfect-twitter-storm.html …
-
-
Replying to @robhon_ @Cartoonsbyjosh and
Just pick one point on which we disagree. If you can’t, why would I read more of them?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Cartoonsbyjosh and
I choose: We clearly disagree about the functional purpose of climate models.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @Cartoonsbyjosh and
Almost there. State what you think I believe is their purpose. I'll tell you if you are accurate.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Cartoonsbyjosh and
It’s right there in my article, Scott. Can I get you to read that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @Cartoonsbyjosh and
Put it here so everyone can see. Just one sentence saying what you think I believe that you do not.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Cartoonsbyjosh and
Just read this part...pic.twitter.com/zrkk8lyf8C
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @ScottAdamsSays and
What models do is constrain the uncertainty. We know much MUCH more with models than without. This means they are “skillful.”
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @robhon_ @Cartoonsbyjosh and
I agree that’s what models try to do. I did financial forecasting for a living. Where is the disagreement?
4 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Cartoonsbyjosh and
Financial models and climate models are profoundly different, Scott. Climate models are based in physics, financial models are not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.