You’re merely playing a childish game rather than engaging on a substantive level w/ actual relevant points.
-
-
It's not obvious to you because you don't seem to able to grasp the experts heuristic people use. Again: https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus.htm …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are a lot of tools you can use to determine if someone is credible. You don't seem to be willing to use those tools.
-
In fact, Scott seems intent upon avoiding them at all cost.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How about you sit down and talk with one and see how it goes?
-
Listen objectively, keep an open mind. Scientists have no interest in purposefully deceiving.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The vast majority of scientist have no vested interest in deception. Maintaining credibility is a career goal. Listen objectively and learn
-
Citizens can't evaluate which competing scientist is right by listening to one side. That isn't a thing.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.