-
-
You realize that's huge controversy in science right now? Literally in the NYT last week b/c tough 2 replicate. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/18/magazine/when-the-revolution-came-for-amy-cuddy.html?_r=0 …
-
Not only were results not replicable, there’s profound difference in inherent power & confidence between job interviewee & defensive lineman
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
stick to ignoring failure to replicate results in a larger sample http://datacolada.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/5110-Ranehill-Dreber-Johannesson-Leiberg-Sul-Weber-PS-2015-Assessing-the-robustness-of-power-posing-no-effect-on-hormones-and-risk-rolerance-in-a-large-sample-of-men-and-women.pdf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scientist here. I'd like to suggest a psychological effect that a) isn't discredited & b) explains your naivety. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_bias …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You keep throwing around “Science” as your defense, but then when actual scientists show you that your evidence is fake, P-hacked, and correlational at best, you just keep on trucking with the same bad argument. Good grief man.
-
Bad study linked, but does anyone dispute that body position influences mind?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It is an entertaining TED Talk, but pretty shoddy science, as even the author of that study acknowledges: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/18/magazine/when-the-revolution-came-for-amy-cuddy.html?_r=0 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.