Scott Adams talks about the worst gun control arguments ever.https://www.pscp.tv/w/bKYvwjExODgwMjU5fDF5TkdhbWdrYVBSR2o9-G3ECL1vvWMePXifSEcrgOey4Joh49rz9xHEqdVfIA== …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
You didn’t address the subject of guns being a deterrent. Not only high-profile people need protection. How about "normal citizens" safety?
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
That is not a good basis for law. Who’s to determine a celebrity is more at risk?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
On the scope you implied it was a reasonable exception. Currently that’s in law. Sorry if you didn’t explicitly say that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slartibartphast
I note that people have different risk profiles. That's all.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Yes but you can see why it is a bad persuasive argument, it appears hypocritical. Not that celebs are as persuasive as they think.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @slartibartphast
The hypocrite argument (in any context) is unpersuasive.
0 replies
1 retweet
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.