You really full of that much hate?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
No. The point of applying a law is to attach a penalty to a behavior you want to curb. There is already a penalty for mass murder.
-
Is more penalty needed for bump stocks?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The importance of the question mark is missed by some. It's a rhetorical question as the premise needed to justify the elimination of laws.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Govts still spend a fortune to ban recreational drugs, regardless that it fails utterly and violates the right to privacy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or a good argument for ending useless laws. Useful laws are, well, useful. Useless are not. Thats all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Taking something to the absurd level... that's a sign of cognitive dissonance, isn't it?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.