At best this speculation since Mr Adams has not provided evidence to support his inference. At worst it is bullshitting. You decide. I have.
-
-
Replying to @lldzne @ScottAdamsSays
If you'd done your homework you might have known he stated clearly and often he was speculating.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Munchensenton @ScottAdamsSays
It is not speculating when evidence shows he made real estate deals and there's no evidence of drug dealing or gun running It's bullshitting
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Munchensenton @ScottAdamsSays
No. Speculation requires evidence to infer a hypothesis. Mr Adams is bullshitting for LOLZ or clicks or whatever it is that drives him.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lldzne @ScottAdamsSays
Here is reality. You are correct he is bullshiting. I am correct that you really hope he doesn't turn out to be correct.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Munchensenton @ScottAdamsSays
I am not hoping for anything. There is no evidence to show he engaged in DD or GR. None. Mr Adams is bullshitting.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Predicting what? The guy made money from real estate and gambling. The article says that. There is supporting evidence. He is not predicting
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lldzne @anuppitypeasant and
At best he is suggesting the information is incomplete. That is not a prediction. It is the nature of an investigation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You can stop now. You don't have the context so nothing you say is addressing anything relevant.
-
-
You have provided no evidence to support your question. Yet, you gave three tweets attacking me. Why?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.