[citation needed] “NO U” isn’t a valid form of argumentation.
-
-
Trying to read one’s mind and discern their intentions is a sign of cognitive dissonance, Scott.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unpack it, Scott. To claim that one can misinterpret a claim that “there are no facts” is exceedingly silly on its face. Show how I’m wrong.
-
Given the context, it means facts do have an impact on outcomes, but we are not capable of knowing facts from interpretation.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.