My view is that a non-scientist has no way to know.
-
-
So are you also an evolution "skeptic"? Round earth "skeptic"? Claiming "skeptic because I'm not a scientist" is just intellectual laziness.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
I lean toward Donald Hoffman's simulated reality hypothesis. You're a decade behind on your science. Try to keep up.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Lol, people such
@elonmusk and@neiltyson have been discussing sim theory for years. Sounds like you're still the one a decade behind?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JonHammJr @jeffmillernz and
Did they do it before I wrote The Dilbert Future in 1997?
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @jeffmillernz and
unfamiliar with this piece. Are you claiming to be the philosophical father of all things related to the sim theory/ disjointed realities?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JonHammJr @jeffmillernz and
No. I'm just saying that's when I started writing about reality being wholly different from our perception of it. Also in God's Debris 2001.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @jeffmillernz and
Ok. Let's refocus here- why do you opt to buy into sim theory, but remain "skeptical" of climate change?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JonHammJr @jeffmillernz and
Sim theory has the best odds. CO2 causes warming, but complex long-term models with human assumptions are not reliable by their nature.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @jeffmillernz and
So you are scientifically competent enough to bless one theory, but feign scientific ignorance to disparage another? Interesting.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Oh, you confused math with science. I see the problem now.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.