Did you trust Nate Silver more than Dilbert in predicting the election? That wouldn't have worked out for you either.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @michaelianblack
A pollster is not a scientist. A prediction about a single election is not the same thing as years of scientific study.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AKBaker2017 @michaelianblack
Please explain more obvious things to me while missing the point.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @michaelianblack
Hey, you're the one who made the equivalency. It's not my fault you make idiotic arguments.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @AKBaker2017 @michaelianblack
"Equivalency" is where you left the tracks.
12:06 PM - 10 Sep 2017
from Pleasanton, CA
0 replies
0 retweets
6 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.