Did you trust Nate Silver more than Dilbert in predicting the election? That wouldn't have worked out for you either.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @michaelianblack
Did you actually listen to or read 538? I know you don't.
@NateSilver538 NEVER predicted anything.6 replies 2 retweets 249 likes -
Replying to @driven2drink @ScottAdamsSays and
He reports probabilities. If you had followed him to the day of the election you would know how hesitant he was with the data.
3 replies 1 retweet 216 likes -
Everyone understands what 98% chance means. You're hallucinating that I don't so you have something to debate.
23 replies 2 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @driven2drink and
"Everyone understands" and "you're hallucinating."
@ScottAdamsSays is a solipsist posing as the voice of everyone not hallucinating.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @freemanjoshuaj @driven2drink and
I show my work. This is public. You can see for yourself that someone mischaracterizes me.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @driven2drink and
"Everyone understands what 98% means" Lie. "You're hallucinating." Lie. Frequent, arrogant, public lies from
@ScottAdamsSays1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
You know someone who doesn't understand odds?
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @driven2drink and
Sure. Lol. But I'll just use your example of hallucinating people and let your own self inflicted contradictions speak for me.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.