It was a massive wealth redistribution scam.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So what political alternative would you suggest? Backing expensive and dirty fossil fuels doesn't really cut it for combating climate change
-
Oh, and remember it was hugely watered down by the US team. Then claiming it doesn't help much is a tad disingenuous.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Make argument, support argument.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What 'experts', Scott (and please be specific for once) since virtually every country is STILL part of the Paris agreement?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sorry, those "experts" are all right, but other experts you disagree with are all wrong
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why don't you provide a citation for your claims? How was it expensive for the US?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How do you choose which experts to believe and which ones not? Convenient the ones you trust confirm your pre-existing beliefs.
-
He believes the ones Trump likes because Trump has an extra sense for detecting hoaxes.pic.twitter.com/8BBHX9UEet
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.