How do you know, Dilbert? Do you understand the mechanism sufficient to review the data and literature? Or are you just relying on anecdotes
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The link between your untenable position and your weak argument for same is also clear.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yet, that particular link (tobacco/cancer) was viewed as fake science . . . and tobacco companies kept advertising-even using MDs.
-
Yes, excellent point, @DAndreAz! Climate science denial is today's tobacco-harm denial, I think.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not less by much like you're implying.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I honestly can't tell if you are joking.
End of conversation
-
-
-
While u sit here caring about some bullshit economic theoretics, the world is warming to a point which will render precious monies obsolete
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Economics aren't going to matter if the human race no longer exists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
For AGW the question is rate of change. That is less certain because human judgement is involved.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.