Is it the side that keeps saying they see clear proof of climate change in anecdotal evidence such as these hurricanes? https://twitter.com/michaelianblack/status/906594413039689728 …
-
-
Lazy comment & Incorrect. Arctic sea ice extant, hurricane/tropical altogether strength, glacier surface shrinkage, etc. all measured.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
All this predicted as consensus by climatologists in 1970's. Includes inc. meridianal meandering of jet stream causing weather extremes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Meandering consequence of measured decrease in Hadley circulation. Poles warm faster than equator. u are ignoring that which contradicts u.
-
You're pretending that the noise is the signal.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Correlations also seen in ocean temperature measurements. 3 recent studies by different countries confirm rise, especially since 1970s
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
In correct. 97% of published climate papers, not scientists, academic peer reviewed papers agree with global warming. That is a consensus.
End of conversation
-
-
-
CO2 focus discredits Climate Change theory, man-made climate changes can happen, like w/Soviets draining Aral Sea. But CO2 is bunk science.
-
You don't believe in the existence of CO2?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.