I call that the Absurd Absolute Tell for cognitive dissonance.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
I'd love to engage in a dialogue, but having listened to your conversation w
@SamHarrisOrg I know that you are not an honest interlocutor.2 replies 0 retweets 38 likes -
Replying to @99Brett @SamHarrisOrg
Can you guess why you seem the same to me?
1 reply 0 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SamHarrisOrg
Except that I'm basing my judgement of you on hours of evidence while you know practically nothing about me as a discussion partner.
6 replies 0 retweets 58 likes -
Why did you ignore his question when replying to it? Is that how you think honest interlocution works?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Munchensenton
1. I did not take it to be a literal question meriting a reply 2. I am not engaging in debate w him and therefore will not answer his Qs.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @99Brett
Ahh so yes that is your version of honest discourse. Problem: You claim to not want to debate someone after engaging them in a debate.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Munchensenton
1/2 - No, stating that I will not engage in discourse is not my version of discourse.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @99Brett @Munchensenton
2/2 - Making a joke about Adams, a public figure, does not oblige me to engage with him or answer his questions, rhetorical or otherwise.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @99Brett
That didn't seem a joke. More an insult. And it is the best example we have of how you use reason.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
You're brutal. Don't ever change.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.