Approximately 97% of scientists working in this field will be surprised to learn how wrong they were: http://bit.ly/2gEUm8v
-
-
The main problem is 100% confidence between the paradigm shifts. I see it in several areas in astronomy.
-
Well, that's a different problem set, one you study. As a real scientist, you see and wish to uproot confirmation bias. TY for help!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We pro-science types know biases are rife on moist robots. We also know 97% of real scientists will be geeky-nerd excited, not disappointed.pic.twitter.com/SySnuIps6h
-
The 97% that have no personal skin in the game about what is challenged, sure. Planck has a famous quote for the other case.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Science of the Brain? Have they discovered all the footprints in that branch of Science?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's the Science of the Brain, Scott? 97% of real scientists will agree there's no such branch of science. Neurology maybe? Hard for yerspic.twitter.com/1syB7GrBJ8
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
A real scientist rebukes and tries to reduce bias. It's 97% likely that you'd be nowhere if China invented the Internet. Lay off science.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Geo. Washington was pro-science, too! We agree we need REAL scientists in GOV.? Can't let a non-scientist be Chief Scientist
@USDA right?
pic.twitter.com/c7gDUt3CTw
-
IMO Management style & objectivity would be more important to guide that agency
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.