Read "The Hockey Stick Illusion". Mann's study is a farce.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Didn't he attack if not "sue" Judith Curry & Mark Steyn for their reviews?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have read that his proxy works well for CO2 but not temperatures. Mark Steyn put together a book with articles written by real scientists
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That clown avoids peer review. An independent arms length reviewer with access to his source data would shred the whole concept.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have no clue
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even if those data failed, there'd still be lots of other evidence, starting with Svante Arrhenius.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Check with
@ClimateAudit He had run ins with IPCC when he asked to review data. Susan Solomon threatened to remove him as a reviewer.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Statistics never lie, nor do "data"...but, the people who manipulate them & make inferences from them can clearly be corrupt to the bone.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think that is where
@ClimateAudit came in.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ClimateChangeModels work based on assumptions they're fed with.Since nobody tracing It in person for Mil years,then
basic manipulationThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.