But no examples of the crazy? Ask yourself why.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @johnstodder and
You still support & defend Trump. That is crazy. As for specific examples of crazy things you've said, I'd need a blog post—not a tweet.
5 replies 7 retweets 117 likes -
Replying to @williamlegate @johnstodder and
I can simplify this. Make one statement you accept as true, and you think I will disagree with. Watch what happens. (Seriously)
1 reply 2 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @johnstodder and
Here are two; take your pick: - Trump is a racist. - Trump is violating the Emoluments Clause.
3 replies 9 retweets 119 likes -
Replying to @williamlegate @johnstodder and
Stick to one point for simplicity. Name your best evidence for Trump being a racist. Pick only your very best. Watch what happens.
9 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @johnstodder and
William LeGate (ig: @legate) Retweeted
His handling of the Central Park 5 case. Even after DNA evidence proved him wrong, he still thinks they're guilty. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/325982969040879620 …
William LeGate (ig: @legate) added,
This Tweet is unavailable.10 replies 11 retweets 117 likes -
Replying to @williamlegate @johnstodder and
The tweet suggests he thinks they were not angels. Beyond that, I don't have opinions of his inner thoughts, so we do not disagree.
12 replies 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @johnstodder and
Why did he not think they're angels? Because they're black? He jumped to conclusions bc of their skin color even after DNA proved him wrong.
6 replies 8 retweets 115 likes -
Replying to @williamlegate @johnstodder and
I have no opinion on his inner thoughts. But I agree he was wrong (as were police) on guilt. Where do we disagree?
9 replies 2 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @williamlegate and
He put out an op-ed calling for the death penalty for them. He stands by wanting them to get death penalty, even after DNA exoneration
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes
That isn't true. Check your facts.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SFdocK and
Wrong. Check *your* facts. Here's the original article from 1989. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/01/nyregion/angered-by-attack-trump-urges-return-of-the-death-penalty.html?mcubz=0 …
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @williamlegate @SFdocK and
You sent me a link supporting my point. You need a link showing he ran the ad after DNA showed innocence. See how confirmation bias works?
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.