The problem with the politics of disavowal: "When you start disavowing, at what point, logically, do you stop?" - @ScottAdamsSays
-
-
Replying to @joelpollak @ScottAdamsSays
That is in no way a problem, unless your disavowals are merely a matter of political expedience, rather than an expression of your values.
2 replies 0 retweets 55 likes -
Replying to @MJtheProphet @joelpollak
I'm in favor of removing FDR's statues because he created Japanese internment camps. Are you on board?
2 replies 3 retweets 8 likes -
-
Replying to @MJtheProphet @joelpollak
I'm exactly on point. The question was where you draw the line. You ran away when you realized you couldn't defend your simpleton opinion.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @joelpollak
No, you responded to a critique of your treating disavowals of bad actors as a political calculation rather than a matter of ethics...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
...by talking about FDR statues. That's not "on point", and it's not a defense of your position.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MJtheProphet @joelpollak
The point is "where you stop." If you don't understand the point, you might want to stop commenting on it.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @joelpollak
I answered that already. Twice. Pay attention.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Oh, you're commenting on a different tweet. This one is about where you stop. I see your confusion now.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @joelpollak
Yes, I'm aware of the dishonest debate tactic you're trying, and I'm not going to let it work. I see why that would baffle you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.