Now we begin the "Was it heartfelt enough?" phase, along with "Why did he NOT mention group X, Y, Z?" (See the problem yet?)https://twitter.com/axios/status/897137324332638208 …
-
0:35 -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
It rings false because he was forced to make a statement. It's a shame the man who should be setting our moral standards, has no morals!
31 replies 5 retweets 137 likes -
Replying to @andyshernoff
You look to the president to set your moral standards? That looks like a problem no matter the president.
36 replies 23 retweets 239 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @andyshernoff
Moving the goalposts. Do you deny the President ought to be a moral person? And do you think he actually IS?
4 replies 2 retweets 57 likes -
Replying to @theDHXavier @andyshernoff
I want a president who has empathy, talent, love for America, and a passion for the greater good. He has those.
81 replies 32 retweets 143 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @andyshernoff
Can you give an example of when the President has shown empathy?
9 replies 0 retweets 71 likes -
Replying to @robbmcdowell @andyshernoff
So you can say he didn't mean it in his secret thoughts?
13 replies 1 retweet 75 likes -
How can you say he meant it when he turns around & says AND retweets that he's considering pardoning a racist like Joe Arpaio?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If we lived in a one-variable world, I would be on your side of this issue.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.