The problem with the politics of disavowal: "When you start disavowing, at what point, logically, do you stop?" - @ScottAdamsSays
-
-
Replying to @joelpollak @ScottAdamsSays
Poor Scott, his life sounds hard. "I can't disavow murder! Where would I stop? I can't disavow pedophiles! Where would I stop? I can't..."
9 replies 24 retweets 396 likes -
Replying to @Tao23 @joelpollak
My personal disavowals are easy! It only gets murky when government does it for us. Who gets to decide who is Nazi enough?
91 replies 12 retweets 43 likes -
People who say they're Nazis out loud and carry swastikas is a pretty good fucking place to start.
4 replies 17 retweets 590 likes -
Everyone agrees with the easy ones. But who gets to decide whether Antifa or Alt-Right are Nazi enough for inclusion?
46 replies 7 retweets 29 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Professor_Jefe and
Considering Nazis are ultra-Fascist and Antifa is literally anti-Fascist this is pretty easy
12 replies 6 retweets 287 likes -
Replying to @triffel_ @Professor_Jefe and
The illusion is that others think like you. Half the country sees Antifa as the Hitlers in this story. See the problem yet?
52 replies 9 retweets 50 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @triffel_ and
I do see the problem. Apologists like you are a big part of the problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
How does the apologist thing work when I agree with you on all points? Is this a new definition?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.