The more I read/listen the less I see of any ethical concern from Scott. Creed appears to be simply "effectiveness uber alles".https://twitter.com/scottadamssays/status/896820878276608000 …
-
-
I've seen you dodge straight questions so many times now Scott that it isn't an omission any more. Or is it? I'd love to hear your ethics.
-
So what are they? What are the proper uses of persuasion and what are improper?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Scott's typos are directly proportional to how worked-up he is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scott just cares that trump passes a tax cut for his rich ass. THAT is his ethical concern.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hitler's dead. There's no omission: trump asked point blank to disavow and refused with the "all sides" garbage.
-
You can't take yes for an answer. All sides includes...everyone.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ad hominem Scott. Your rhetoric is showing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.