No one died yet from either method. That's a tie.
-
-
-
Replying to @CeaselessChange
If I imagined you don't care about millions of innocent lives, your comment would be sensible.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
If you think "no one died from this approach" is a serious point of equivalence then... shrug. It's a childishly silly thing to say.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CeaselessChange @ScottAdamsSays
If you have a better defence for unserious triviality in the face of genuine horror, I'm genuinely listening.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CeaselessChange @ScottAdamsSays
Until then I'm filing it under "man falling from building contends it just as safe as sitting on sofa because no one has died either way".
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CeaselessChange
I just wanted to hear you refute your "no one died" standard. Now we're on the same page. Pro negotiators would say current method = best.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
If you think I did you didn't understand me :) Your pro negotiator analogy is fun but not helpful. Nor was the persuasion master one.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CeaselessChange
My filter predicted president Trump. It also predicts progress on North Korea. Compare to your filter in a year.
4 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
perfect example of when one outrageous prediction works out then crazy people think all of their other outlandish predictions will come true
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
One? Must be new here.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.