Scott Adams tells you what he thinks about the Google "manifesto" firinghttps://www.pscp.tv/w/bFnctzExODgwMjU5fDFlYUtibXd2bFJxeFjl9NUfxXb263XMybIups1Qz0WtD_dCz2J4hlM-28bGcg== …
-
-
Yes. But may cause much internal anxiety. By "bad for a company" I meant: may be bad for innovation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He gave them two ways to lose, and gave himself one way to win. And they angered more people, but the people they didn't count more.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They have angered lots of people. And angered them very greatly. Nothing that guy said was unreasonable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thought experiment: if you expressed anti-Google opinion on this would WhenHub's prospects be affected?
-
PS- not judging either way.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
3rd option: protect those who can't protect themselves
-
after he tried to expand idea exchange, a lynch mob had all power in a judgment process. Google is steward of fairness then.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.