@SamHarrisOrg @ScottAdamsSays Pruitt’s terrible plan to “objectively” assess climate science https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2017/8/2/16082020/pruitt-red-team-exercise?utm_campaign=vox&utm_content=entry&utm_medium=social&utm_source … Why this is a bad idea
-
-
Discussing supposed settled science threatens settled science. Gotcha. Public debate is a high-ground maneuver, Vox calls foul. F'k them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sci hypoth testing,data interpret&results arent interp in for/against teams. Study design,results,data,analy&interp is peer-rev'd&replicated
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Point is clear AF: Red v Blue is attack exercise, attack of already vetted facts.pic.twitter.com/f4mQpayVoc
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.