None. History shows us we can't buy friends, only fund enemies.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your reference is wrong. Given 2% current and 3-4% Trump planned. The correct answer is like .25% which on 17-18 trillion is still a lot
-
That's if the 'great negotiator' can pull off 3-4%. And that's a big 'if' given the amount of opposition here & globally.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You really couldn't exceed 1 and have Trump's agenda work at all
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hear Cambodia makes a hell of a TV. Maybe we need to start helping those folks with a few factory's?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Vs potential nuclear war? Even one warhead is past 9/11 magnitude damage. False choice though, why do we have to shrink GDP?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What is this reduction entail- loss of trade or increased defense spending?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
False choice
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Any... besides, it would only be temporary. We are well able to take care of our own needs. We have farm land, resources, energy, etc.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.