Oh, honey...
-
-
Replying to @RalfThePowerful @ScottAdamsSays
You left out your arguments, i'm sure it's a coincidence, sweetheart
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jeitoapp @ScottAdamsSays
Your remark wasn't an analysis or conclusion, just a statement contrary to fact. An argument isn't necessary.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RalfThePowerful @ScottAdamsSays
alright let's try this again one step at the time. who's funding NATO?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jeitoapp @ScottAdamsSays
Nobody. It's an alliance. Each member has to spend a minimum percentage of GDP on their OWN military. That's it.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
The general fund not only represents a minuscule amount (about $1.5b TOTAL), but the shares contributed by each nation aren't changing.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
It's pretty funny that you didn't know any of that.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PersuasionRisng @JasonL3d and
None of this contradicts what I said. This just gets funnier and funnier.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RalfThePowerful @JasonL3d and
It'd be like if you tried to say California would get money if Mississippi raised state income taxes. They're discrete budgets.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Did you over-interpret "money pouring in"? Awkward.
-
-
There is no universe in which your statement is correct.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.