I'm in. Losers it is.https://twitter.com/cnn/status/866942234310189056 …
-
-
As with most Dilbert strips, this made me laugh because it feels true but after thinking about it for more than 60 seconds I'm not sure
-
What one-word label would you use for them that wouldn't play right into the "image" they are trying to promote?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I disagree you replace it with a better ideology. Meaning ibn Rushd instead of ibn Taymiyyah go look them both up Scott.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We've been losing the propaganda war, if there even is one. This is perfect.
-
You won't win it by calling them losers. They've been called that and worse by others. THE ONLY WAY TO SOLVE IT IS TO REPLACE THE IDEOLOGY
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
With trump wwii and nazis would be handled different? Perhaps not such a long war?
-
Do you think Hitler would have cared if he was called a "loser"? "Better not invade Poland this guy thinks I'm a loser"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I...I... I agree with Scott Adams. Today is a weird day.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yea because a faith at war with infidels for thousands of years will be swayed by calling them names children use on the playground. ok
-
Exactly. What Scott Adams totally whiffed on was that ISIS doesn't care what Trump says. They care what ibn Taymiyyah says and only that.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.