@LudWitt Absurd absolute: "Every issue"
Ludwig W@LudWitt·May 14, 2017Actually Dilbert's "climate scientist" seems you confuse climate science with economic policy.24
Ludwig W@LudWitt·May 14, 2017Many who disagree with popular economic prescriptions to climate change, argue not against alternative economic policies but science itself3
Scott Adams@ScottAdamsSays·May 14, 2017Approximately zero people out of 7 billion people on earth argue against science itself. That's an illusion.129
Ludwig W@LudWitt·May 14, 2017Actually, no. Many prominent GOP politicians deny not just anthropogenic climate change but climate change itself.43
Ludwig W@LudWitt·May 14, 2017And Creationists who argue Earth is 6,000 yrs old deny science of evolution (vs methods of evolution). Millions who argue against Science11
Scott Adams@ScottAdamsSays·May 14, 2017You can be pro-science and still think science got some stuff wrong. (Even if it didn't in this case.)213
Ludwig W@LudWitt·May 14, 2017Scientific modelling of reality gets stuff wrong ALL the time. Nothing is ever 100%. Science is only as good as the validity last prediction1
Ludwig W@LudWitt·May 14, 2017But the opposite of that is to claim science can't predict anything. Climate change models predict with >98% ranges discussed.21
Scott Adams@ScottAdamsSays·May 14, 2017On Twitter, the one who resorts to the absurd absolute first is the debate loser: "Can't predict anything."1210
Ludwig W@LudWitt·May 14, 2017You make every issue about "winning" and "losing" not about truly understanding or clarifying.12
Scott Adams@ScottAdamsSaysReplying to @LudWittAbsurd absolute: "Every issue"1:35 PM · May 14, 2017·Twitter Web Client2 Retweets1 Quote Tweet8 Likes
Ludwig W@LudWitt·May 14, 2017Replying to @ScottAdamsSaysJust curious: Have you ever backed down from a challenge or admitted someone else had a valid counter to your point?1
Scott Adams@ScottAdamsSays·May 14, 2017No, I have been 100% right about 100% of everything since I was a fetus. (See what I did there?)315