Point blank - Clinton was an inferior candidate. Live with it already!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Worst electoral college results since Dukakis.pic.twitter.com/t9UAbJq0eg
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Their implication seems to be she assumed from "data" that she was going to win, so never-mind persuasion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She was weak in 08 when Obama beat her & weaker in 16 when Bernie almost beat her.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She was a weak candidate: health, scandals, unlikability, poor campaign. All she had was name recognition, but Trump persuasion factor too.
-
She would have beaten any other Republican.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Is it also valid to say that Trump deliberately aimed at the working class in a cynical (albeit successful) attempt to gain their support?
-
I say cynical because he surely has no interest in the working class other than to further his interests.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not necessarily, if the election was decided by the popular vote, each would have campaigned differently. Trump campaigning in CA, etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wrong. She won by 3 million votes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.