Isn't the proper "solution" not more products but to conserve and cut-back and simplify lives? How do we "invest" in doing less?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I love your # Garfield comic! That fat cat is soooo funnnny @
-
You are new here. That is a huge tell for cognitive dissonance.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What's the perfect amount of atmospheric CO2?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There's pollution control and there's CO2 control. The pollution in China is not a CO2 problem
-
Coal burning has to be part of it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
or just watch nature get down http://i.imgur.com/mxJ47F7.gifv
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
. Why not prevent pollution instead? BTw the ec. Impact of Climate Change will be bigger.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's never a either/or, so agreed. I was trying to disconnect the "other" impacts from coal versus the CO2 discussion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A great way to sequester carbon is plant green things, which snatch CO2 out of the air & exude oxygen. A win-win.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.