Scott, Climate scientists have done loads of this stuff already. The question is, why haven't you seen it? (1/n)
-
-
Replying to @dougmcneall @ScottAdamsSays
I'm not kidding, this is a really important question. Why are these messages not getting through? Two possibilities .. (2/n)
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @dougmcneall @ScottAdamsSays
1) Climate scientists are really bad communicators, and need to really push this stuff hard and better and more often. (3/n)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dougmcneall @ScottAdamsSays
2) You (and others) are really resistant to the messages. You're not paying attention, and willfully ignoring stuff. (4/n)
5 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @dougmcneall @ScottAdamsSays
So maybe it's a mixture of the two. But I'm guessing people are going to start pointing where we've done what you say. (5/n)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @dougmcneall @ScottAdamsSays
Seems like he's blaming scientists for some Buzzfeed post about AGW.
@ClimateOfGavin response is solid.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Response might be 100% accurate, but lacks credibility because of the communication form.
4 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
could you show us some examples?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
My blog post covered it.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Details were different, the lack of relevant context was the same. See the pattern.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
you have made very broad, hand-Wavey accusations.
@ClimateOfGavin1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dougmcneall @ScottAdamsSays
it should be really easy to back them up with examples.
@ClimateOfGavin0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.