This is how you use rhetorics to create confusion rather than illumination. 1960s cigarette makers would be proud.https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/833786690065936384 …
-
-
widen the sample size on any complex scientific question and you’ll get more disagreement. Doesn’t add value.
-
If 60% of those extra "extra" scientists were skeptics, wouldn't that tell you something useful?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
you’re basically using persuasion to convince people to use a less meaningful sample because it aligns with your views
-
No. Like you said initially, he's saying that 97% needs to be understood as what it is vs what's implied.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
should we also ask biologists about cosmology research?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.