Can scientists judge those claims? No way. Running models is science, why drawing analogies between models and earth is not.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2 pts: interesting how Al Gore isn't a scientist but made millions. Doesn't take a scientist to see data tampered with.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd go with what the scientists say then.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Good question: How many nuclear meltdowns would still be better than climate change catastrophe?
- Show replies
-
-
-
You don't need to be scientist to understand and assess the data and arguments. Just ask Al Gore.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As a scientist & logician I look for a case that invalidates the claim. The ideal CO² level for plant growth is 4 times atmospheric levels.
-
Another way is to look at how the claimants act? If they claim the world will end if we don't stop have they stopped?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If a theory doesn't make falsifiable predictions, it isn't science. If those predictions are wrong, the theory is wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.