Climate Science Challenge. Find a scientist -- just one -- who says the climate prediction models are credible:http://bit.ly/2hNEFHD
-
-
second, take some time to read up on differences between surface and satellite base observations.http://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-how-surface-and-satellite-temperature-records-compare/ …
-
And then use my deep scientific knowledge to evaluate it all? Why are you missing the main point here?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Easy answer, Scott: which of those two has sought & passed peer-review, and which has avoided it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Easy: the source, which also claims "sun is main driver of climate change". Trivially easy to disprove that.
-
also showing only mid-troposphere 20S to 20N should be a tipoff that something fishy is going on.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
.
@ScottAdamsSays@hausfath Moving the goalposts, Scott?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're relying on
@FriendsOScience ? Come on, Scott; you're not really that gullible. Are you? -
The actual b.g. graph is from Christy+Spencer U Alabama Huntsville /2
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Also only compare models where atmosphere is linked to ocean https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupled_model_intercomparison_project …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ah, yes, a new trend is to equate raw data with real data. Raw is laden with systematics, instrumental effects.
-
"tampering" is removing those effects to the best knowledge of scientists. That knowledge improves over time.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.