Damn, I am a big fan of analogy. But thanks. Damn looking forward to your book in October.
-
-
-
analogies are good for teaching, explaining and selling but not for refuting an adversary.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If I were a newborn to the climate change debate and saw the words "99% of all scientists...!" I would be highly skeptical.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
genuinely interested, not meaning to troll, why you see popular vote as irrelevant data
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
By naming something, we gain power over it. Thank you for naming the "so tell"-- now I see it everywhere.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wild guess. They're the ones that don't work?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most of the tweets I see that are trying to be persuasive fit at least one of those categories. Explains a lot.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think this reflects page 1 of The Screwtape Letters. Essentially avoid any discussion of right/wrong, true/false.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this disregards the extent of victory and treats a 20 point and 1 point win in a state the same
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but more importantly reduces election to 13 states candidates have to care about while 37 others ignored
-
whereas a popular vote contest would represent all 50 states because votes in Oklahoma and California count
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.