That supports my points.
-
-
-
It is little more than an emotional appeal & one that depends on quite a bit of ignorance, too.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @QA_NJ
YOU just can't deal with the science based REALITY that Schneider is presenting.
@ScottAdamsSays3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The REALITY is that Earth's climate has varied between snowball & no ice caps without human intervention.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @QA_NJ
You clearly have read NO research on these issues.
@ScottAdamsSays2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Wrong. I've read plenty of the research. Took a college-level climatology class, too.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
@ScottAdamsSays You are the one with little but name calling, so what does that make you? Bully? Blowhard? Ignorant? Fool?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @QA_NJ
I'm merely extraordinarily exasperated by people who reject the overwhelming body of science. I'm f-ing tired of it!
@ScottAdamsSays3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
What is the percentage-right track record of science even when a strong majority was on the same side?
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @QA_NJ
Nonsensical question. But come to expect that from you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.