You are rejecting the science. Peer review is the way it works. Imperfection exists, but rejection is moronic
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @79FenderStrat @ScottAdamsSays
Doubt exists. But it has been decades since denier points were seriously debated in journals.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @OKftl @79FenderStrat
That doesn't necessarily mean what you think it means.
3 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @79FenderStrat
Yes, it really does mean what I think it means. The alternative is too stupid to be imagined.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OKftl @79FenderStrat
The alternative looks just like Shy Trump supporters. It's a thing.
5 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
So for four decades these deniers have been sitting on evidence that climate science is all wrong. Secret.Makes total sense.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @OKftl
Your confusion all comes from the same source -- a lack of understanding of confirmation bias. More evidence doesn't fix that.
4 replies 3 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
But just reading two arguments, not recognizing some terms and saying GUESS WE'LL NEVER KNOW is lazy and irresponsible.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.