"Tuning" the prediction models? How can we non-scientists know what to believe? Both sides sound persuasive.https://twitter.com/scottthong/status/805235875705589760 …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
@scottthong Both sides are not equal. Over 90% of scientists agree in global warming.15 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Overwhelming scientific consensus as to man made cause of global warming.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Please feel free to read the science and publish your own rebuttals in peer reviewed journals.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
That's exactly what Lord Monckton has been doing successfully https://youtu.be/DrWznOFq38s
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
At 57:40 just as
@ScottAdamsSays suspected, peer reviewed study proved CO2 reduction now costs 100x adaptation later3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The cost of fixing a problem always goes up the longer you wait. True for climate, medicine, etc
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.