"Tuning" the prediction models? How can we non-scientists know what to believe? Both sides sound persuasive.https://twitter.com/scottthong/status/805235875705589760 …
-
-
Planning for the highest probability outcome is not unreasonable in either case.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Election polling, esp for President, not nearly as developed a science as chemistry, biology, physics.
-
I can assure you 90% of physicists, solar dynamics, astronomy, and geologic scienctists do NOT concur.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Climate science backed by years of detailed data collection, thousands of peer reviewed papers.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Global cooling had little support in scientific community,mostly media hype;Global warming different
End of conversation
-
-
-
pretty much all said she'd win by a few points and she won by 2.
-
And in fact polls were more accurate than in previous elections.http://pollyvote.com/en/2016/11/17/first-analysis-of-the-pollyvotes-2016-popular-vote-forecast/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.