Until they were proven not to be. After that Trump continued his erroneous position
-
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @plewis1956 and
Note what the 2003 police report concluded from this article: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/10/trump-the-central-park-5-are-guilty-despite-dna-evidence.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QA_NJ @ScottAdamsSays and
I'm shocked that the police who originally said they were guilty continued to.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @plewis1956 @ScottAdamsSays and
Perhaps because they understand the context of the confessions?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @QA_NJ @ScottAdamsSays and
A Court understood the context of the confessions and hurled them out of court.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @plewis1956 @ScottAdamsSays and
And there are plenty of people who believe that was wrong, not just Trump. My point.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @QA_NJ @ScottAdamsSays and
In our system public opinion on guilt/ innocence means nothing. They're not guilty
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @plewis1956 @ScottAdamsSays and
Second, "not guilty" doesn't mean you didn't do it: http://www.defendingoregon.com/innocent-v-guilty/ …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
DNA exonerated the CP5. They convicted the real assailant, who confessed, w DNA match. Trump is a racist.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Sounds like he was just wrong. Same as the police.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.