.@ScottAdamsSays 100% wrong. You forget that Clinton wouldn't be replaced by vacuum; she'd be replaced by Sanders. He does well vs Trump.
-
-
True. I'm just trying to understand how someone not even running would replace Hillary instead of 2nd place guy.
-
cause we elect one winner and the runner up is irrelevant. If she can't go, then we choose someone else.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
why is that logical. The majority of the party rejected sanders.
-
I don't quite know how to further explain why if Hillary drops out, the other person with delegates should get it..
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.