@aaronread1 He shows his work. That's all I ask.
Who is less rational? Liberals or conservatives?http://reason.com/archives/2015/02/06/when-liberals-ignore-science …
-
-
-
@ScottAdamsSays@aaronread1 There's no evidence (I've seen & I've looked) that fracking has extreme downsides
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aaronread1 Are his claims not common knowledge? -
@ScottAdamsSays@aaronread1 He definitely cherry picks though. While many Dems are against vaccination, Rep rate is higher (for example)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aaronread1 I thought he said studies found no harm to drinking water. Is the claim false?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aaronread1@ScottAdamsSays Every energy source kills people. Solar has killed more than nuclear. http://slatestarcodex.com/2015/02/04/links-215-linkconceivable/#comment-181038 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aaronread1@ScottAdamsSays Maybe it will be more dangerous in 1000 years, or maybe we will have even better solutions to make it safer thenThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aaronread1@ScottAdamsSays Scare mongering works. That doesn't mean it's a good way to make decisionsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aaronread1@ScottAdamsSays Really? Gasland as your source of truth? On the fire: http://reason.com/archives/2013/07/05/the-top-5-lies-about-fracking … Other: http://energyindepth.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Debunking-GasLand.pdf …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aaronread1@ScottAdamsSays of course. Only people who benefitted would take the time to debunk. Doesn't mean they are wrongThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.