Right. Not accused, and no evidence we know of that would change it.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
You are commenting about the merits of an investigation you are not privy to. You don't need to know the specifics of the evidence to acknowledge there is an investigation. You don't know the evidence in the Hunter Biden investigations either.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MrMokelly
I knew you'd agree with me eventually. You took the long way.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @MrMokelly
What They Mean Retweeted Scott Adams
Which takes us back to this tweet, where you said knew specifics about the investigation.https://twitter.com/scottadamssays/status/1377255095566409729?s=21 …
What They Mean added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Translates_ @ScottAdamsSays
It is weird how he alleges to know anything about the underlying evidence in an investigation when he is privy to NONE of it, but makes declarative statements about the evidence and what it shows. While telling us we don't know what the evidence is/shows. Weird I tell you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MrMokelly @Translates_
You are hallucinating all of that. Literally none of that happened.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Translates_
So now you deny what you actually typed? You are willfully dishonest. "This story has a lot of layers, but apparently none of those layers include any evidence of Gaetz doing anything improper. " You are trolling now. You point blank attested to level of evidence. YOU did.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The story was not an evidentiary dump. It was an acknowledgement of the existence of an investigation and into what. THAT'S IT. You're being willfully obtuse now.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MrMokelly @Translates_
Did you fall on your head? You are literally talking nonsense and hallucinating.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Translates_
You can talk like that to your friends or followers. I'm neither.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Translates_
Yes, because you were getting intellectually dragged and not smart enough to find a better way out.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.