Ivor, why don't you give me the single strongest claim from the article and I'll tell you what I think about it.https://twitter.com/FatEmperor/status/1368318170197594118 …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Unfortunately he glazes over the thing that would be easiest to determine/prove: PCR false positive rate (says he could talk all day about it then nothing) Some goods points, nothing you havent heard before - natural immunity works - vaccine data sparse - numbers bloated Etc
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @threeguysyesh @ScottAdamsSays
There are indivuduals who take PCR tests daily for work (high profile athletes, media) False positives are easy to see because they come between 2 days of "Not Detected" results From what I've seen, the rate could easily be 1/20 to 1/50 350m tests in US = 7m-17.5m false+
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @threeguysyesh @ScottAdamsSays
That's out of a total of 30m positive US cases False positives could explain asymptotic rates entirely And nobody is checking
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @threeguysyesh @ScottAdamsSays
Then consider any positive test associated w a death goes into the death count Somebody really needs to be checking on this a year into a worldwide lock down
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Yep. A lab informed me you can have the virus in your nose, accurately detected, but it never gets into your system.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @threeguysyesh
A larger problem is that the snippet of RNA that is tested isn't that unique..
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.