-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
tl;dr— No We see reality in a way that yields the largest evolutionary advantage Which isn’t actually how it is (“how it is” is too much information to process. A lot of it is unnecessary. We don’t need to see Ultraviolet radiation to be able to reproduce at 25)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Professor Donald Hoffman will win the Nobel Prize! Picture when he was honoring IMiF (INTERNATIONAL MINDS in FINLAND) as TEAMNEURSHIP SPEAKERpic.twitter.com/qVbtPmsR2V
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It isn't difficult to understand at all. Problem, Reaction, Solution... Those in power want more money & more power & the serfs don't say "NO"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
YES! Finally,
@donalddhoffman is the bestThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I haven't watch the vid yet but will...short answer, NO, we do not see reality as it is. Not even close.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Psychedelic use should end any delusion that we see base reality.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Our reality is constructed of schema, these are inherited pattern interpreters past down from eons of life through our genetics. We can then imprint our specific experience on top of these primordial schema to makes sense of what is around us.
-
Behaviorism went too far in discounting the work of the analytics. Carl Jung needs to be brought back into 21st century psychology.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.