Do we do autopsies on children who die with seasonal flu or do we do "election fraud math" and conclude that because no underlying conditions were obvious, they do not exist? Take a guess, even if you are not an expert. What do you think is more likely?https://twitter.com/AboutPediatrics/status/1363872460722954246 …
-
-
His immune system had been vetted thoroughly as a result of his premature birth. His twin...not so much. There were regular tests of his immune system and development. The body's reaction was completely normal, it was the behavior of the virus that led to his death. 1/x
-
Per the autopsy the virus, per a roughly 1/1,000,000 chance, had chosen to eschew his respiratory system and permeated his circulatory. The causality of that chance has never been fully explained, but when Child Protective Services got involved, (in child death this is common)2/x
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
A human response: “I am so sorry for your loss.” The end. Try it.
-
hoo... man??
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How is this *possibly* your response to him sharing about the loss of his son?
-
He entered the conversation to share what he knows. I'm interested. It matters. We all see that you're morally superior, peacock, so your work is done.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is objectively terrible. How about “I’m so sorry for your loss” as a starting point?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You insist on being wrong and cruel. What a terrible combination
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.