Yup. Like someone having a system for predicting lottery numbers, even if the number comes up, the prediction is not worth listening too.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@politicalmath is credible, but it is because his credibility is imported to Twitter from his substack.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
meaning what, exactly?
-
One thing he means, is don't get your epidemiology advice from people who were diet gurus before covid (Ivor Cummins).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Except for this guy -
@tickerguyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I suppose all of the data could be accurate and if we don’t notice any patterns, it’s possible that there is an observer problem, since the patterns we don’t see may exist, plus we have no reason to suggest there is any correlation to anything whether or not they do exist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hey! I trust my own COVID19 study, but what you say about not trusting data is why I set up the citizen science project. I wanted http://Cure-Hub.com to be the one place where people can see transparent data and even get a neutralizing antibody test to assess their own risk
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
With all due respect, you yesterday retweeted a post suggesting the holidays led to increased spread when it was very clearly just a result of less testing/reporting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.