She gave an example of something they are starting from scratch doing: A federal distribution plan that didn't exist before.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Not sure how axios fitting all this in a tweet somehow changed that ..
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @jwickers
It changed it from a reasonable statement into an untrue statement. Like the Fine People Hoax. No different.
7 replies 2 retweets 48 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @jwickers
TIL Even Trump’s impeachment lawyer believed the hoax until mid-trial! https://jewishinsider.com/2021/02/david-schoen-trump-impeachment/ …pic.twitter.com/BWkcfsrRAS
5 replies 70 retweets 170 likes -
By all means PLEASE provide a complete clip where Trump EVER has specifically & without caveat or deflection denounced white nationalist or any other member(s) of his extremist, worshipful, base. Good luck.
21 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
When you find out there are entire compilation clips of the thing you have never seen, it will shake your confidence in your news sources. Good luck on your journey.
3 replies 10 retweets 118 likes -
There’s absolutely nothing to shake. I’ve been doing my own research for over five years now. While there’s many a well edited clip on all matters, it sadly doesn’t change the overshadowing narrative when you research everything said, done and indefensible for a very long time.
7 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JasonVanHorne @ScottAdamsSays and
Trump’s behaviors are egregious. He knows how to manipulate those who are more easily swayed, he has done so with a white nationalist base which he refuses to denounce & of course wouldn’t - those are his militants. We had an attempted coup that failed but not by lack of effort.
6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
He definitely wanted everyone's vote, including QANON. But he said that directly, and our system encourages pandering to all groups you can sway. Every candidate for president does it, albeit with different repugnant groups.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Yes but the problem comes when it causes an attempted coup and the POTUS never condemns those groups. Anyone sensible, moralistic person with integrity would have. They also wouldn’t have allowed it to go on for hours. It was a coup, they wanted to achieve. It doesn’t take much..
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Obviously it was a problem. But it's fake news to believe it was obviously foreseeable. If it had been, security would have been adequate and the news would have warned us it was coming and no officials would have been in the Capitol.
-
-
How was it not foreseeable? It’s your “opinion” that it was not. Just like it’s mine that it was. If you follow right extremist forums it would be considered reasonable to anyone that a challenge could present itself but who had final authority in providing security? It’s ..
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JasonVanHorne @ScottAdamsSays and
reasonable to think 1) the lack of security was purposeful to the purpose of the attempted coup and/or that 2) it was not given as much attention because we’re complacent as a county & couldn’t imagine a coup happening here. Those are minor concerns. It was a coup & the POTUS...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.