I peer reviewed your peer review and it checks out. Trust the science.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There will be 'no' Nobel Prizes for this Op-Ed. I will take any bets!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is interesting to note that the paper which first suggested the furin cleavage site in the spike protein MIGHT NOT be natural, was suppressed. The paper was supposedly retracted pending a re-write, but I have not heard about it reappearing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where’s the sequence data? Where’s the material and methods section? They’re not wrong. It “might” have. Anyone else have a hypothesis that “might” be true. Let’s not limit ourselves, chose any topic you like.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's irrelevant to what's important in this paper. (I was just citing its description in another article).
-
Addendum can be found here:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bies.202100017 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You made my day! Thank you!
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.