Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Simon DeDeo‏ @SimonDeDeo Feb 10
      Replying to @JoshHochschild @zizip

      We had a long exchange where I did my best to understand the epistemic structure of your views. This is the best representation I can make, that takes your passion seriously and respectfully.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    2. Joe Norman‏ @normonics Feb 10
      Replying to @SimonDeDeo @JoshHochschild @zizip

      you seem to be treating sincere people like lab rats while simultaneously ignoring the structural problems with our election processes that lead to legitimate doubt

      1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
    3. Simon DeDeo‏ @SimonDeDeo Feb 10
      Replying to @normonics @JoshHochschild @zizip

      I’m trying to look at things from the outside; this is my attempted summary of a number of different longer-form engagements. It’s imperfect, and purely anecdotal.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    4. Josh Hochschild‏ @JoshHochschild Feb 10
      Replying to @SimonDeDeo @normonics @zizip

      Simon, you could answer my questions, or you could request the longer expiation I’ve offered, but psychoanalyzing me is condescending and I figured you for better than that.

      1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
    5. Simon DeDeo‏ @SimonDeDeo Feb 10
      Replying to @JoshHochschild @normonics @zizip

      I’m not attempting to psychoanalyze you, and I’m happy to answer a question—what’s the question? (I’m sorry if I missed it.)

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    6. Josh Hochschild‏ @JoshHochschild Feb 10
      Replying to @SimonDeDeo @normonics @zizip

      Josh Hochschild Retweeted Josh Hochschild

      Our conversation ended with me posing a question. And if you go all the way back to the beginning, you’ll see it started when you joined the comments of my original post which also asked a question.https://twitter.com/JoshHochschild/status/1359529288425472001 …

      Josh Hochschild added,

      Josh Hochschild @JoshHochschild
      Replying to @SimonDeDeo @zenahitz
      Thank you for pressing me, I think this has been a helpful exchange. I'd be interested in your thoughts, if you have any, as to why there hasn't been more public discussion, or even acknowledgment, of what I'm interested in (the vitiating-condition Y-factors, not the X-cases).
      1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
    7. Simon DeDeo‏ @SimonDeDeo Feb 10
      Replying to @JoshHochschild @normonics @zizip

      That’s a harder question. A great deal of attention has been given to particular claims and scenarios. But I would agree that your position, which explicitly refrains from scenario-posing, has received much less attention.

      3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    8. Simon DeDeo‏ @SimonDeDeo Feb 10
      Replying to @SimonDeDeo @JoshHochschild and

      Probably the most prominent person that your position reminds me of is @ScottAdamsSays. Scott has general suspicions, without committing to a particular scenario, and is much more interested in the second-order question...

      3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    9. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays Feb 10
      Replying to @SimonDeDeo @JoshHochschild and

      My position is that any non-transparent digital system will be hacked eventually, if the stakes are high enough. And they are. You don't need proof to know it WILL happen, although the timing is a question.

      2 replies 2 retweets 12 likes
    10. Simon DeDeo‏ @SimonDeDeo Feb 10
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JoshHochschild and

      Let me push you a little bit. Do you think it’s possible, to a similar extent that the 2016 election was stolen? (This is not an attempt to draw you in to a debate about whether or not it was.)

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays Feb 10
      Replying to @SimonDeDeo @JoshHochschild and

      Yes, of course. One plausible scenario is that Democrats under-cheated in 2016 because they believed the Fake News Industry reporting that Trump couldn't win. Also could have been foreign influence or GOP cheating.

      4:54 PM - 10 Feb 2021
      • 1 Retweet
      • 7 Likes
      • Kevin Watson Tom Barloco Frogger Nobody Bansi Sharma sjokotof William Crowe TL
      2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes
        1. Vaccinated and Loving it‏ @FighterTh Feb 10
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SimonDeDeo and

          Plausible means more than you can imagine a motive.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Simon DeDeo‏ @SimonDeDeo Feb 10
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JoshHochschild and

          Just to disentangle things here: did the Republicans cheat as well in 2016? Or did they just win by a smaller amount because the Democrats “under heated”? (I think you mean the first, because you’re saying 2016 was “stolen” as well.)

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Dio Mavroyiannis  🌊‏ @diomavro Feb 10
          Replying to @SimonDeDeo @ScottAdamsSays and

          Is that a plausible scenario? Did the swing states that voted for Trump have republicans running the voting booths?

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info